Privilege hides in plain sight — not in what we have, but in what we never have to notice. This reflection explores how asking deeper questions can unmask comfort as inequality and why confronting our own ease is the starting point for real equity and leadership growth.
We tend to think of privilege as a personal possession — something one owns or flaunts. But in truth, privilege is an architecture. It is the scaffolding that holds up comfort for some while leaving others to shoulder the weight below. Most of us live inside this architecture without realizing it. It feels solid, neutral, fair — until someone taps the beam and we hear the echo.
When we talk about uprooting privilege, we are not talking about guilt or charity. We are talking about vision. The courage to see the frame around the picture we’ve been taught is the whole world.
The trick of privilege is that it hides most effectively from those who benefit from it. It teaches us that our perspective is normal — that our version of professionalism, or punctuality, or communication style is simply how things are done. We rarely pause to ask: for whom is this normal?
That is the first rupture. The moment we realize that what we call “neutral” is simply familiar to the powerful. That what we see as “good fit” or “executive presence” or “high potential” is often a mirror of ourselves.
In my work across organizational culture and learning, I see this pattern constantly. Teams with good intentions replicate the same narrow rhythms of comfort. They hire people who “get it,” meaning people who already speak the dominant dialect of power. They celebrate belonging without noticing who never truly arrived.
Privilege survives not because we defend it consciously, but because we rarely stop to imagine what it feels like not to have it.
Some while ago, as I pondered things like belonging, bias, and privilege, I began shaping a reflective framework — a kind of privilege screen. It isn’t an assessment of moral character; it’s a set of questions designed to help us catch ourselves in the act of unseeing.
The framework rests on six dimensions — Perspective & Representation, Access & Benefit, Risk & Burden, Language & Framing, Empathy & Humility, and Continuity & Accountability. Each dimension asks a different kind of question, not about what we believe, but about what we notice.
Taken together, these dimensions form a mirror, one that refuses to flatter. They transform “privilege” from a headline word into a daily discipline — a way of designing, deciding, and leading with humility of perspective.
The workshop we call Identifying and Uprooting Privilege is, in essence, a guided confrontation with invisibility. It’s a day that refuses comfort. The experience moves like a wave — beginning with seeing, then feeling, then choosing.
It opens quietly, with participants walking through a Mirror Gallery — ten ordinary workplace scenes printed on large posters: an off-site at a winery with no childcare support, a wellness room inaccessible to wheelchair users, a performance review that subtly praises confidence in one body and calls it arrogance in another.
People move silently among these vignettes. They begin to recognize how often harm hides behind logistics and tone. They start to feel the architecture.
From there, we build conversation. Participants map their own advantages in a Privilege Inventory. They name the ways they’ve been able to move through doors without noticing who had to hold those doors open. The exercise is simple and devastating: every list is a mirror.
Later, the room grows louder. In a role-play sequence called Speaking Up, participants practice confronting inequity — from both sides. They feel how much emotional energy it takes to challenge power, how hard it is to stay calm when your comfort is interrupted. Then comes a pause and a short lecture on emotional labour — the tax paid by those who must constantly translate, soothe, and educate. That lesson always lands with an ache. You can feel the air shift.
The afternoon brings language under the microscope. Groups dissect words like “fit,” “professionalism,” “merit,” “resilience.” They learn how vocabulary becomes policy, how tone is a gatekeeper.
Then the pace slows again. A listening exercise invites humility — participants practice hearing feedback without defending. It sounds easy until they try it. The silence afterward is its own curriculum.
The day closes with the creation of a Personal Equity Charter — a simple document where each person writes the commitments they are ready to make. Some promise to change hiring language. Others commit to rotating who takes notes in meetings or who plans social events. Every charter is different, but all share the same quiet heartbeat: I will stay uncomfortable. I will keep seeing the frame.
Participants often describe the day as exhausting — in the best way. Not because they were lectured, but because they were required to feel what they usually outsource. They discover that discomfort isn’t the enemy of learning; it’s the evidence that learning is actually happening.
There are tears sometimes. Anger too. There is also laughter — the kind that comes when self-recognition meets grace. What’s remarkable is the shift that follows: people begin to intervene differently in their everyday contexts. A manager rethinks who always takes the meeting notes. A project lead notices whose calendar conflicts are ignored. A learning designer widens her definition of who the “typical learner” is.
That’s the quiet power of this work: it doesn’t end when the chairs are stacked. Once you’ve seen the frame, you can’t unsee it.
Uprooting privilege isn’t about shaming advantage. It’s about reassigning the responsibility for awareness. The work of noticing should not belong only to the marginalized; it must become the habit of the comfortable.
To do that, we need tools — frames for deframing. The question set I’ve described is one such tool: simple, imperfect, alive. It’s meant to travel — to be used in boardrooms, classrooms, council meetings, design sessions. Every time someone asks one of its questions, the architecture of privilege loosens just a little.
When we commit to this kind of seeing, something else happens too. Relationships deepen. Decision-making slows down — not out of hesitation, but out of respect. Creativity expands, because imagination finally has more than one vantage point. The organization begins to breathe differently.
I have come to believe that the greatest mark of leadership is not certainty, but sight. The leaders who change cultures are the ones who learn to see what others overlook — and then choose to do something about it.
Privilege resists that kind of vision. It tells us we’ve earned everything, that fairness already exists. But fairness never grows from assumption. It grows from attention — from a thousand small moments of noticing and adjusting.
So, if you find yourself reading this with a twinge of defensiveness, good. That’s the place to start. Privilege does not dissolve through guilt; it yields through curiosity.
Ask yourself: What am I not seeing because I’ve never had to? Whose world gets edited out of mine?
And then, keep asking.
Because once you begin to see the frame — once you recognize how many others live outside it — you can start building something larger, something fairer, something that finally fits us all.
When you work with Guiding Star, you ignite real transformation — in your people, your teams, and your impact. Let's spark light, warmth, and lasting excellence for your customers, donors, and stakeholders.
Reach out today. Let's build something brilliant together.
.png){kind=logo}